Why Copilot & Cursor Still Fail on Complex Codebases

Sep 26, 2025

2 min read

Article

Share with:

Stop manually explaining your codebase to AI—it still won't get it

AI tools use agentic search to "understand" your code at runtime. We break down why this is inefficient, slow, and leads to bad code, and why a persistent knowledge layer is the only real solution.

You ask GitHub Copilot or Cursor to make a change across a few services, and the results are wrong. The common defense is, "But it can search the whole codebase!"

And that's true. Modern AI assistants use an "agentic" search loop. They don't just find files; they try to build an understanding of your code at runtime by repeatedly searching, analyzing the results, and searching again.

But this runtime approach is a clever patch, not a real solution. And in a professional setting with complex codebases and distributed teams, it's a deeply flawed one.

How "Runtime Understanding" Actually Works (and Fails)

When you give a complex prompt, the AI agent kicks off a loop:

  1. It reasons about your request and runs a search.

  2. It analyzes the search results.

  3. It refines its understanding and runs another, more specific search.

  4. It repeats this until it thinks it has enough context.

This is better than a simple file search, but it has critical failures for team environments:

It's Painfully Slow. This iterative process is a performance killer. Each loop involves multiple expensive calls to the AI model. This is why a single complex query can leave you waiting for minutes. For a developer trying to stay in the zone, that kind of latency is unacceptable. Multiply this across your entire team, and productivity craters.

It Has Amnesia. The "understanding" the agent builds is temporary. As soon as the task is complete, that entire map of your code is thrown away. The next developer (or you, five minutes later) who asks a similar question forces the agent to start its slow, expensive discovery process all over again from scratch.

Its Understanding is Incomplete. The agent's final context is entirely dependent on the path its search takes. If an initial query misses a subtle dependency in a different repository, that dependency will never be considered. The AI will confidently give you a solution that works for the partial context it found, but is fundamentally wrong for your system as a whole. This is how architecturally damaging code gets written.

It Doesn't Scale Across Teams. Each developer is essentially aligning the AI from zero on their portion of the codebase. PMs can't get quick answers to basic technical questions. QA teams struggle to understand system behavior. Knowledge stays siloed, and the expensive discovery process gets repeated by every team member.

The Real Fix: A Persistent, Holistic Knowledge Layer

Instead of forcing an AI to frantically re-learn your codebase for every single query across every team member, a knowledge layer takes a different approach.

It builds a complete, holistic map of your entire architecture—across every repo and service - before anyone asks a question. It's not a temporary understanding; it's a persistent, structural "brain" that is always up-to-date and accessible to your entire team.

It's Fast: Your AI doesn't need to perform a slow discovery loop. It makes a single, fast query to the knowledge layer and gets a rich, architecturally-aware answer instantly.

It's Complete: It doesn't follow a narrow search path. It has a global view of every dependency, ensuring the context is never incomplete.

It's Efficient: The hard work of understanding the code is done once, continuously, in the background—not repeated wastefully for every prompt from every team member.

It Scales Across Teams: PMs get instant answers to technical questions. QA teams understand system dependencies. New developers onboard in weeks, not months. The knowledge is centralized, not trapped in individual heads.

The Bottom Line

Relying on an AI that has to re-learn your architecture every time someone hits "enter" is not a scalable strategy for professional development teams. It's slow, expensive, and unreliable - and it gets worse as your team and codebase grow.

The professional solution is to give your tools access to a permanent brain that already understands your code. Stop settling for runtime guesses repeated across your entire team, and start demanding real architectural intelligence that works for everyone.

Ready to put ProdE to work for your team?

Ready to put ProdE to work for your team?

Ready to put ProdE to work for your team?