Case study · Leena AI · Enterprise virtual assistants · Series B, YC S18
Leena AI, ten months in.
Where usage stands ten months after rollout, and what it has been worth.
People on ProdE
166 93% have used it (155)Questions in 10 months
15,272 in 3,615 conversationsRunning coding agents
103 104,666 agent tool callsCodebase
53 repos 7M+ lines of code"ProdE is the only tool we've used that actually understands our codebase end to end."
Company profile
Leena AI builds enterprise virtual assistants for HR, IT and finance teams, serving clients in healthcare, FMCG, technology, aviation, telecom, retail, pharma and education. YC S18, Series B. Its product, engineering, QA, support, solution consulting and customer success teams, 166 of them on ProdE, work across 53 repositories and more than 7 million lines of code.
Then and now
Three job functions at three months, seven at ten.| 3 months in | 10 months in | |
|---|---|---|
| On the platform | 93 | 166 |
| Have used it | 68 | 155 |
| Teams | engineering, product, support | engineering, product, QA, design, solution consulting, customer success, support |
What changed
| Before | After (client reported) |
|---|---|
| Answer to a cross-team question in 2 to 3 days | 15 to 30 minutes |
| Engineer onboarding in weeks | Days |
| Cross-service debugging in hours | Minutes |
| PRDs built on assumptions | PRDs built on the actual code |
The before
Leena's solution consultants, customer success and support teams know the product and the clients but do not work in the code. A question about how a feature behaves for one client meant finding the right engineer, interrupting them, waiting, and often a second round when the answer did not quite fit.
Engineering had a similar problem across 53 repositories: the service named in a ticket was often not the one that owned the behavior.
Every one of those questions cost an engineer's attention and the asker a wait. Leena's teams asked 15,272 of them in ten months.
Who uses it, and for what
| Team | How they use it |
|---|---|
| Engineering | Cross-service debugging. Finding which of 53 repositories owns a behavior. Coding agents that read the system map before they touch code. Fixes start in the right service. Senior engineers field fewer questions. |
| Product | Checking a PRD against the existing code: what the feature touches, what already exists, where the edge cases are. Engineering gets specs grounded in the code. Fewer surprises in development and QA. |
| QA | How a flow actually works and what validation applies, before writing tests or filing a bug. Tests match real behavior. Root cause is known before the ticket is raised. |
| Solution consultants | How a feature behaves for a specific client, configuration and integration questions during a deal. Answered on the call instead of the next day. |
| Customer success and support | Client tickets, data questions, the cause of an issue a client reported. Resolved without waiting on an engineer. Answers come with references into the code. |
| Design | How a flow is implemented today before redesigning it. Designs start from the real system. |
| New joiners | Learning the system by asking it questions. Productive in days rather than weeks. |
Agents on the same map
103 people connect their coding agents to ProdE over MCP. 104,666 agent tool calls in ten months. The agent pulls the system map and the relevant code before it starts, so it works in the service that owns the behavior rather than the one named in the ticket. Agent use has grown steadily every month since launch.
What they ask
| Objective | Share of questions |
|---|---|
| Understand the system (architecture, data model, where is X implemented or configured, which endpoint) | 51% |
| Debug and root cause | 20% |
| Plan and design a feature | 12% |
Daily use
Daily active users, monthly average. ProdE analytics dashboard.Daily use grew about five times in ten months, from the November 2025 rollout to October 2026, across chat and coding agents.
What it adds up to
What this is worth modelled
~850 engineer hours a month returned: questions from other teams that no longer land on engineers, cross-repo digging replaced, agent sessions. Five engineers' worth of time. ~230 engineer interruptions a month that no longer happen. ~$850K a year at $80 an engineer hour.Not counted: the waiting time on every question, and onboarding time.
Counts are from ProdE's analytics. Hours are modelled per question and per agent session from how a question got answered before ProdE: find the owner, interrupt them, they dig and answer, a clarification round.
The results
| Metric | Result (as of Oct 2026) |
|---|---|
| People on ProdE | 166, 155 have used it (93%) |
| Codebase | 53 repos, 7M+ lines of code |
| Questions answered | 15,272 in 3,615 conversations |
| Who uses it | Engineering, product, QA, design, solution consulting, customer success, support |
| Agents on ProdE | 103 people, 104,666 agent tool calls |
| Engineer time returned modelled | ~850 hours a month, 5 engineers' worth |
| Engineer interruptions avoided modelled | ~230 a month |
Why it stuck
See it on your own codebase
Connect your repositories to ProdE. Your engineers, your PMs and your coding agents get the same map of the system.